Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Location: smart dude uses scroogle.org, a blood zapper and a cb.
|Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:07 pm Post subject: Natural Immunity or Artificial Immunity?
|By MICHAEL BAUCE
The most important job you have in this lifetime is to raise your kids properly. With that in mind, my wife and I decided NOT to vaccinate our children soon after the birth of our first son in 1985. This decision was a well thought- out one. We weighed both sides equally and made the choice in the interest of are kid's future. We were happy to find out that are choice was quaranteed under California Health and Safety Code Section 120365 and also by federal law. It should also be noted that the American Medical Association is currently working to deny freedom of choice in this matter. If the AMA truly beleives vaccination protects from disease, why would unvaccinated children be a threat to vaccinated ones?
Our decision was based on our understanding of health, which was slightly different than modern sensibilities. Instead of interering with the development of their immune systems through artificial vaccination, we would allow them to develop naturally. Our responsibility was to allow this to happen through a balanced diet-paticularly a whole grain-vegetable based one-and lifestyle. We took this responsibility very seriously. We were over joyed with the results.
The first thing that happened was resistance from school officials when we went to register are unnvaccinated kids. We were told they could not be admitted becuase they would endanger the health of others. They weren't informed of the law, so i made sure to bring copies for them.
The next thing we noticed was whenever a flu or lice epidemic spread through their respective classrooms, our kids were never affected. In fact, the appeared healthier and happier than all of their counterparts. In talking with other parents who made the same choice not to vaccinate, we heard the same stories over and over again. Years later, after our kids are grown, we see the continued benefits of the choices we have made.
Modern health experts will scoff at our conclusions becuase it runs contrary to what they have been taught. Their conclusions are based on studies of children with weak immune systems. They have not studied, do not trust, nor have they experienced natural health or healing on a personal level.
A newly released book, The Blue Zones (Dan Buettner, National Geographic, 2008), indentifies areas arounnd the world today where people live long happy lifes (into their 100s), virtually free of desease. Their diet is mostly whole grains and vegetables and they have little need for doctors or vaccinations. One such zone is located right here in California.
I, like many others, was vaccinated as a child. I also spent a good portion of my childhood in and out of doctors' offices, taking antibiotics frequently. I was a sitting duck for every germ that came down the pike. As an adult, howerver, I enjoy excellent health. I have learned that germs are not the cause of disease, just the symptoms of it. I've worked hard establishing natural immunity. Instead of handing the responsibility of my personal health over to the so-called experts, medical professionals and pharmaceutical corperations, I have chosen to accept it as my own and then to explain it to others. The rewards have been enormous.
Should free speech apply only to political expression or should it apply to all, including criticism of medical science? Let's keep in mind that although ungodly amounts of money continue to flow to Western medicine, disease continues to flourish without any end in sight. People continue to drop like flies from cancer, heart desease, and diabetes. This is something we may want to talk about.