Cell phone location data not private, Feds argue

Post new topic   Reply to topic    PsyWarriorMatrix.com Forum Index -> Other Government Cover-Ups
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Site Admin

Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Posts: 6749
Location: Here Now. Somewhere Else Later

PostPosted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:05 pm    Post subject: Cell phone location data not private, Feds argue Reply with quote

Individuals have no reasonable expectation of privacy in historical cell phone location data collected and maintained by phone companies, a federal prosecutor said in oral arguments Monday before a three-judge panel from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

The court is reviewing an appeal from the U.S government in a case pertaining to the government's authority to collect historical cell phone location data from a phone company without obtaining a formal search warrant first.

Federal prosecutors in the case have maintained that the Stored Communications Act (SCA) of 1986 allows them to use a relatively easy-to-obtain court order, called 2703 (d), to force a cellphone company to turn over historical cell-site location information on specific subscribers.

Privacy advocates have insisted that law enforcement authorities should be required to obtain search warrants based on higher reasonable cause standards before they can ask a carrier for cell phone location data. They have argued that any location data collected without such a warrant is a violation of Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure.

Privacy watch
Cell phone location data not private, Feds argue
Are you being watched ... by your phone?
Hacker group claims access to 12M Apple device IDs
California Assembly OKs bill banning warrantless smartphone tracking
Can Facedeals overcome 'creepy' factor?
Are biometric ID tools evil?
Ill. bans firms from asking workers, job seekers for social media info
'Wall of Shame' exposes 21M medical record breaches
California to get tough on online privacy
Judge dismisses privacy lawsuit against LinkedIn
More in Privacy Center
The case is an important one and comes at a time when lawmakers and courts around the country are grappling with the issue of warrantless tracking of location data by law enforcement authorities. Many have expressed concern that unbridled cell phone location tracking will let the government conduct extensive surveillance on cell phone owners.

In August, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Fourth Amendment protections do not in fact extend to cell phone location data. In arriving at the decision, the court maintained that there is little constitutional difference between tracking a suspect physically on public roads and using cellular technology to do the same thing.

The Sixth Circuit's decision was somewhat at odds with one arrived at two years ago by the Third Circuit appellate court which held that law enforcement authorities needed to obtain search warrants to gather customer cellphone location data stored by phone companies.

Meanwhile in California, state lawmakers recently passed legislation that would have required law enforcement to obtain a search warrant for seeking location-tracking data. California Governor Jerry Brown however vetoed that bill last weekend.

The case before the Fifth Circuit goes back to 2010 when law enforcement authorities in Houston, Texas, tried to obtain separate, but similar court orders seeking to compel two phone companies -- T-Mobile and MetroPCS -- to give up 60-days worth of cell-site location data pertaining to criminal suspects in three separate investigations.

Two of the targets of the investigations were suspected drug traffickers while the third was suspected of being involved in gang activity.

A Texas Magistrate judge who reviewed the applications for the 2703 (d) orders denied each one on the grounds that any compelled disclosure of cell-site data would be a violation of Fourth Amendment protections.

A Houston District Court that heard the government's appeal of the decision concurred

More here:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9231976/Cell_phone_location_dat a_not_private_Feds_argue

Thank you for supporting WarriorMatrix at:
Please, share...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PsyWarriorMatrix.com Forum Index -> Other Government Cover-Ups All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum